Executive Summary
Harvard Business Review’s report on interim CEOs focuses on a narrow category: interim appointments at large public companies. Professional interim CEOs serving private companies, private-equity-backed businesses, family-owned companies, and nonprofits operate differently. They are brought in to solve urgent business problems, lead transformations, and deliver measurable results.
To illustrate the difference, we share six real-world interim CEO success stories from the InterimExecs RED Team, including turnarounds that increased revenue, EBITDA, and cash flow; leadership transformations; successful company sales; and a hospital turnaround completed in just four months.
When Harvard Business Review ran an article looking at research on CEO vacancies at 400 large public companies between 2002 and 2024, it offered some pretty damning statements:
- Interim appointments are among the most disruptive succession choices.
- Interim CEOs shift their focus to short-term performance in the hope of being hired permanently.
- Overall, the companies saw their return on assets decline by 2 to 3% during the interim CEO’s tenure.
While we don’t doubt the veracity of this research as it applies to the small percentage of American companies in the S&P 1500, we take significant umbrage at the sweeping statements that are now being returned in Google results. Here is Google’s AI summary of the article: According to Harvard Business Review, appointing an interim CEO can be disruptive and often hurts financial performance if handled poorly.
While handling something poorly is never a recipe for success, we firmly disagree with this characterization of interim executives.












